Mark Zuckerberg has his List.
Not a to-do list. A real list of high-stakes talent engineers and researchers poached from OpenAI, Google DeepMind, and others tasked with building Meta’s Superintelligence Labs. He’s putting serious capital behind this team. Reports say some packages top $100 million.
Some call this a sign of desperation. Others call it ruthless. I see it as another classic Zuckerberg move: ignore the noise, build the future, and let the results speak for themselves.
We’ve seen this playbook before:
In 2012, Facebook was supposedly dead in the water on mobile. Zuckerberg rebuilt the company around mobile ads, and it became the company’s growth engine.
In 2018, after Cambridge Analytica, the market thought Facebook couldn’t recover trust. Yet Meta stabilized and grew.
And in 2021, when he rebranded to Meta and pivoted to the metaverse, most called it a vanity move. But Meta now leads in consumer AR/VR and built some of the market’s strongest VR platforms.
Zuckerberg has been counted out many times before. And almost every time, he has proven the market wrong. Just as a matter of reference, over the last five years, Meta Platforms stock has been one of the best performers ever. Its shares have given a total return of 192%, far higher that the S&P 500′ index’s of 102% over the same time period (The Motley Fool).
Today, the AI arms race is on. He’s moving fast, pulling in leaders like Scale AI’s Alexandr Wang and former GitHub CEO Nat Friedman. These aren’t just technical stars they are people who’ve built platforms and led teams through tough, competitive markets.
But as Zuckerberg assembles his technical List, I can’t stop thinking: where’s the other List?
The List of leaders who aren’t just brilliant, but trusted. The ones who know how to manage difficult trade-offs, navigate conflict, and keep diverse stakeholders aligned when the stakes are global. The ones who combine competence with likability because in the end, people follow those they respect and want to work with.
The AI race isn’t just about the smartest algorithms. It’s about who can build resilient systems across energy, infrastructure, and society. Already, the superintelligence labs are pushing against physical limits: energy consumption, chip production, water cooling for datacenters. The next challenge isn’t just better models it’s keeping the grid online and the supply chain stable.
And look who’s showing up at the table now: Saudi Arabia, the UAE, PIF and other sovereign wealth funds that control trillions in capital. They’re not just investing they’re shaping the infrastructure of the AI era.
Add in visionaries and risk takers like Masayoshi Son, who see AI as the next industrial revolution, and it’s clear this race is now a geopolitical and economic contest.
So while Zuckerberg builds his List of technical brilliance, someone else needs to build the List of systems leaders.
Leaders who understand the messy reality of global coordination.
Leaders who can bridge tech and policy, investors and regulators, East and West.
Leaders who aren’t just smart they’re clear communicators, conflict managers, and emotionally intelligent decision-makers.
People who others actually want to work with, even when the decisions are hard.
The first List builds the algorithms.
The second List keeps the whole system working fairly, safely, and humanely.
Because unchecked, AI will optimize for speed and scale. But that’s not enough. We need to optimize for resilience, trust, and the social contract that makes technology worth building in the first place.
Zuckerberg has proven he can execute against the odds. I wouldn’t bet against him again. But the bigger challenge is whether we can build the human infrastructure alongside the technical one.
Without that, we risk creating machines that are superintelligent yet societies that are fragile.
The future of AI won’t be decided by code alone. It will be shaped by the leaders who can bring people together across sectors and countries, solve problems, and earn the trust to lead us forward.
Because the real question isn’t just “who’s on Zuckerberg’s List?”
It’s “who’s on the Human List the one that makes sure this revolution still serves the world, not just the datacenters?”